
For research use only. We do not supply to patients.
For pharmaceutical-grade products or other inquiries, please contact our experts.
This meta‑analysis of 11 randomized trials (6,098 patients with acute coronary syndrome, weighted mean follow‑up 11 months) compared prasugrel and ticagrelor. No significant difference was found in the primary composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96‑1.42). Secondary outcomes (stroke, cardiovascular death, major bleeding, stent thrombosis, all‑cause death) also did not differ significantly. However, ticagrelor was associated with a higher risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.05‑1.81, p=0.02). The authors conclude that prasugrel may offer an advantage in reducing MI risk.
Fig. 1 Central illustration: comparing the efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor among acute coronary syndrome patients. (Fong LCW, et al., 2022)
References
In STEMI patients receiving prasugrel, chewed tablets produced higher levels of the intermediate metabolite (PIM; R‑95913) than integral tablets (AUC 73 vs. 33 ng·h/mL, P<0.05). PIM negatively correlated with platelet aggregation inhibition. In vitro, PIM dose‑dependently antagonized the anti‑aggregatory effect of the active metabolite (PAM; R‑138727) (maximum effect ‑49.5%, P<0.001). Molecular dynamics simulations showed PIM competes reversibly with PAM at the same P2Y₁₂ binding site. PIM is an antagonist of prasugrel’s active metabolite, reducing its antiplatelet activity.
Fig. 2 Structural in silico analysis of inactive and active metabolites of prasugrel. (Minuz P, et al., 2025)
References
Daily: 9.30 AM–6.00 PM
Sunday : 9.30 AM–1.00 PM
Holidays: Closed
All our products are chemicals for research purposes only. We do not supply for human or veterinary applications.
Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy Copyright © Protheragen. All Rights Reserved.
